Turn prompt-engineering research into audit-ready evidence.
For teams claiming R&D tax incentives or reporting on grants: AIScholar documents technological uncertainty, keeps a contemporaneous activity log, tracks effort by category, and exports a complete evidence package — while you do the research you were doing anyway.
Why contemporaneous documentation matters
R&D incentive regimes — following the OECD's Frascati Manual framing — ask for the same things everywhere: evidence of a technological uncertainty that a competent professional could not resolve from existing knowledge, a systematic process of experimentation to resolve it, and records made at the time, not reconstructed at filing season. Systematic prompt-engineering research fits this frame naturally — but only if the paper trail exists.
AIScholar's R&D module builds that trail as a by-product of the pipeline you already use: every design created, run launched, coding pass completed, and analysis executed is logged automatically, with timestamps, while you work.
The evidence, piece by piece
Uncertainty statements
Versioned statements of the technological uncertainty your work addresses, with AI-assisted drafting and an AI quality evaluation that critiques weak or generic claims before an auditor does.
Contemporaneous activity log
Auto-generated entries for every pipeline action, plus manual entries with notes for work done outside the platform. Exportable as JSON and CSV.
Effort tracking
A floating start/stop timer on every pipeline page, manual time entry, weekly summaries by activity category — investigation & design, experimentation, analysis, support — and CSV timesheet export.
Knowledge progress tracker
Records what was learned against each uncertainty statement, with evidence links, remaining uncertainty, and resolution status — the "systematic progress" auditors look for, with AI-drafted summaries.
Inactivity nudges
A seven-day inactivity threshold triggers a gentle banner so documentation gaps are caught in the week they happen, not the year after.
ZIP evidence package
One export bundles the summary markdown, uncertainty statements, activity log (JSON + CSV), knowledge progress, and an effort & expenditure summary with a categorization guide.
How teams use it
Enable R&D mode per project
Flip the toggle on any project where the work may qualify. A clear legal disclaimer sets expectations, and R&D endpoints are enforced server-side only while the mode is on.
State the uncertainty early
Draft the technological uncertainty statement at project start — with AI assistance — so the record shows the uncertainty preceded the experiments that resolved it.
Work; the log writes itself
Run your study as usual. The activity log accumulates automatically; the timer captures effort; the knowledge tracker records findings as they land.
Export for your advisor
At reporting time, download the ZIP package and hand it to your tax advisor or grant office — organized, timestamped, and categorized.
Documentation, not advice
AIScholar produces organized, contemporaneous records. Whether specific work qualifies for a specific incentive is a determination for your tax professional — the module is explicit about that boundary, in-product and here.
The R&D trail pairs naturally with the scientific audit trail in reproducibility — one records how the research was done, the other why it counts as research.
Explore more of the pipeline
- ReproducibilityVersioned prompts and coding schemes, full trial metadata, a Method Specification Prompt, and one-click reproducibility packages.
- Hypotheses & experimental designFrame testable predictions, then build factorial, fractional, matched-pair, or custom designs with an AI design wizard.
- Prompt constructionTurn factor levels into concrete prompts with a versioned snippet library, a variation grid, and an AI prompt wizard.
Turn a question about LLMs into published research.
Start your first study today. No human participants required.