Cross-cutting · R&D Documentation

Turn prompt-engineering research into audit-ready evidence.

For teams claiming R&D tax incentives or reporting on grants: AIScholar documents technological uncertainty, keeps a contemporaneous activity log, tracks effort by category, and exports a complete evidence package — while you do the research you were doing anyway.

Why contemporaneous documentation matters

R&D incentive regimes — following the OECD's Frascati Manual framing — ask for the same things everywhere: evidence of a technological uncertainty that a competent professional could not resolve from existing knowledge, a systematic process of experimentation to resolve it, and records made at the time, not reconstructed at filing season. Systematic prompt-engineering research fits this frame naturally — but only if the paper trail exists.

AIScholar's R&D module builds that trail as a by-product of the pipeline you already use: every design created, run launched, coding pass completed, and analysis executed is logged automatically, with timestamps, while you work.

The evidence, piece by piece

  • Uncertainty statements

    Versioned statements of the technological uncertainty your work addresses, with AI-assisted drafting and an AI quality evaluation that critiques weak or generic claims before an auditor does.

  • Contemporaneous activity log

    Auto-generated entries for every pipeline action, plus manual entries with notes for work done outside the platform. Exportable as JSON and CSV.

  • Effort tracking

    A floating start/stop timer on every pipeline page, manual time entry, weekly summaries by activity category — investigation & design, experimentation, analysis, support — and CSV timesheet export.

  • Knowledge progress tracker

    Records what was learned against each uncertainty statement, with evidence links, remaining uncertainty, and resolution status — the "systematic progress" auditors look for, with AI-drafted summaries.

  • Inactivity nudges

    A seven-day inactivity threshold triggers a gentle banner so documentation gaps are caught in the week they happen, not the year after.

  • ZIP evidence package

    One export bundles the summary markdown, uncertainty statements, activity log (JSON + CSV), knowledge progress, and an effort & expenditure summary with a categorization guide.

How teams use it

  1. Enable R&D mode per project

    Flip the toggle on any project where the work may qualify. A clear legal disclaimer sets expectations, and R&D endpoints are enforced server-side only while the mode is on.

  2. State the uncertainty early

    Draft the technological uncertainty statement at project start — with AI assistance — so the record shows the uncertainty preceded the experiments that resolved it.

  3. Work; the log writes itself

    Run your study as usual. The activity log accumulates automatically; the timer captures effort; the knowledge tracker records findings as they land.

  4. Export for your advisor

    At reporting time, download the ZIP package and hand it to your tax advisor or grant office — organized, timestamped, and categorized.

Documentation, not advice

AIScholar produces organized, contemporaneous records. Whether specific work qualifies for a specific incentive is a determination for your tax professional — the module is explicit about that boundary, in-product and here.

The R&D trail pairs naturally with the scientific audit trail in reproducibility — one records how the research was done, the other why it counts as research.

Turn a question about LLMs into published research.

Start your first study today. No human participants required.