Machine psychology
Machine psychology is the study of large language models as behavioral research subjects: models are probed with controlled text inputs and their responses are analyzed with the experimental and statistical methods originally developed for studying humans.
What "Machine psychology" means
The core move of machine psychology is to treat the model as a participant rather than a tool. Instead of asking whether a model can complete a task, the researcher manipulates the input systematically — framing, persona, wording, parameters — and measures how the distribution of responses shifts. A single answer from a model is one draw from a probability distribution, so machine-psychology studies rely on many replications per condition rather than one-off outputs.
This framing imports the discipline of experimental psychology: hypotheses stated before data collection, factorial manipulation of independent variables, operationalized outcome measures, inferential statistics, and effect sizes. It also imports psychology's hard lessons — instruments must be validated for the new population, measurements must be reliable, and results must survive robustness checks such as paraphrasing the prompt.
Machine psychology differs from benchmark evaluation. A benchmark asks "how well does the model score on task X?"; a machine-psychology experiment asks "what changes the model's behavior, by how much, and does the effect generalize across models and phrasings?" The unit of analysis is the trial — one model, one fully-resolved prompt, one parameter set, run once — and the object of interest is the pattern across thousands of trials.
How AIScholar uses it
AIScholar is built for machine psychology end to end: an eight-stage pipeline takes a study from hypothesis and factorial design through prompt construction, replicated execution against any OpenRouter model, response coding, statistical analysis, and academic write-up.
Related terms
- Factorial & fractional factorial designFull vs. fractional crossing of factor levels, aliasing trade-offs, and when to use each.
- Prompt sensitivityMeasuring how results change under semantically-equivalent rewordings of a prompt.
- Psychometric validity for LLMsRe-establishing reliability and validity when human instruments are administered to models.
See these methods working together.
Every glossary concept is a built-in capability. Design a study and use them on a real question.